<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Institute of Biblical Defense &#187; salvation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/tag/salvation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com</link>
	<description>Upholding and Defending the Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Time to Sow … and a Time to Tear</title>
		<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/a-time-to-sow-%e2%80%a6-and-a-time-to-tear/</link>
		<comments>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/a-time-to-sow-%e2%80%a6-and-a-time-to-tear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Ginorio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spoken Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Originally posted by IBD Vice President Matthew J Coombe on mjcoombe.com What is the demarcation between orthodoxy and heresy? Or that, when believers disagree about various dogma and doctrine at what point does one claim “heresy” and discontinue fellowship? Before answering this question, it must be stated that the idea of dis-fellowship should only be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://mjcoombe.com/?p=273">Originally posted by IBD Vice President Matthew J Coombe on mjcoombe.com</a></p>
<p>What is the demarcation between orthodoxy and heresy? Or that, when believers disagree about various dogma and doctrine at what point does one claim “<em>heresy</em>” and discontinue fellowship? Before answering this question, it must be stated that the idea of dis-fellowship should only be applied to <em>believers</em>. If this standard was applied to unbelievers or people who have no consistent and reliable information about Jesus and the Bible, why would we suppose them to be anything less then heretics? Further, if there was no fellowship with such people, how would they learn and know the truth? Thus, if a unbeliever holds to an errant view of Jesus it should not be faulted on that person, but rather, with meekness and fear correct the view.</p>
<p><a href="http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bible_open.png" rel="lightbox[547]"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-548" style="border: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px; padding: 2px;" title="The Word of God" src="http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bible_open.png" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>The believer is held to a much higher standard. It is difficult in this age to refute errant views of “<em>Christianity</em>” because Christianity has become a a synonym for “theism.” In this, we often hear people say, “<em>well I&#8217;m a Christian who believes…</em>.” And then they make some horrible exegesis from scripture or emote concerning some current ethical issue. So then, the point of this blog is to answer the question, “to what can the Christian say,<em> ‘I believe…</em>’” and it still correspond with orthodoxy?</p>
<p>The primary, essential credentials for orthodoxy are <em>the fundamentals of the faith</em>. This is minimal Christianity. If one does not hold to these, they are not, by any means, a true born-again Christian. These fundamentals are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>The inerrancy of the Scriptures</li>
<li>The virgin birth of Jesus</li>
<li>The deity of Christ</li>
<li>The bodily resurrection of Jesus</li>
<li>The immanent return of Jesus</li>
</ol>
<p>Of these, there is only one I have any leniency on and that is <em>inerrancy of Scripture</em>. However, I am only lenient to the point that the other four fundamentals of the faith can still be gleaned and defended. If the Bible becomes so errant that the deity of Christ has become forfeit such a view of Scripture is detrimental. On the other hand, if one feels the Scriptures are completely accurate save a few historical or cultural datum I may not believe that either (although this view also upholds the other 4 points).</p>
<p>Some cults and various man-made religions claim to hold to these, but this is only to maintain the guise and stability of true Christianity. Over the course of the next few days I will be writing on each of the fundamentals, clearly defining them so as to avoid this cultic “bandwagoning.”</p>
<p><a href="http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/one_follow_jesus.png" rel="lightbox[547]"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-551" style="border: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px; padding: 2px;" title="Will one follow Jesus" src="http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/one_follow_jesus-300x224.png" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>As for now, allow me to finish this thought. <em>If anyone does not hold to these fundamentals, I would really question their relative Christianity</em>. Now, as stated before, people often refer to themselves as &#8220;<em>Christians</em>” when what they really mean is theist. The reason I make this distinction is that if one claims to be a Christian, they are soldered to very specific views about the Bible, Jesus and the other fundamentals—any strays in these areas cause the erosion of Christianity into finite human religion.</p>
<p>Besides the fundamentals there is also a moral reasons to break bounds. Paul clarifies this when he wrote to the Corinthian Church:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? But those who are outside, God judges.&#8221;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Paul claims that people professing to be believers who live in immorality give us Biblical grounds to no longer have fellowship with them. However, I&#8217;ve seen this taken too far. There are some Christians who won&#8217;t have fellowship with <em>non-beleivers</em> because of immorality. We must remember, it is not the healthy that need a doctor but the sick.</p>
<p>The freedom of Christian choice concerning the morality of actions must be based on the Bible. If someone claims, “<em>I am a Christian who believes it is okay for me to have sex with my boyfriend</em>.” This is beyond the scope of choice given to the believer. It is clear that any sexual act outside of marriage is a sin. If an act or the idea of it is not forbidden in scripture, and it ultimately leads to the good, one is free to partake in it.</p>
<p>Bottom line, <strong>if one does not hold to the fundamentals or is living in immorality they are not in a position to be in proper fellowship.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/a-time-to-sow-%e2%80%a6-and-a-time-to-tear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Q&amp;A with Dr. Fernandes</title>
		<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/new-qa-with-dr-fernandes/</link>
		<comments>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/new-qa-with-dr-fernandes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Ginorio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spoken Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arminianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difficult questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernandes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>This previous July, Dr. Fernandes sat down for a question and answer session. He was asked a series of common &#8220;Bible College&#8221; questions. These are questions that almost all Christians at one point or another confront, often without a satisfactory conclusion. We hope these answers help. The questions answered in this Q&#38;A session include: If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p>This previous July, Dr. Fernandes sat down for a question and answer session.  He was asked a series of common &#8220;Bible College&#8221; questions. These are questions that almost all Christians at one point or another confront, often without a satisfactory conclusion. We hope these answers help.</p>
<p>The questions answered in this Q&amp;A session include:</p>
<ul>
<li>If God is good, why does evil exist?</li>
<li>If God is three persons, where is the body?</li>
<li>Is there a difference between belief and faith?</li>
<li>Calvinism or Arminianism?</li>
</ul>
<p>Comments are welcome.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/22841DBC85ABB4F6&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/p/22841DBC85ABB4F6&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2010/01/new-qa-with-dr-fernandes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Assurance of Salvation&#8221; (pt. 2)</title>
		<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/09/assurance-of-salvation-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/09/assurance-of-salvation-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Ginorio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spoken Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arminianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philfernandes.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Here’s the full video of the sermon from August 30, 2009. It’s the second half of the sermon entitled “Assurance of Salvation“. Dr. Fernandes defends a sound and biblical doctrine of salvation that successfully overcomes the Calvinism versus Arminisnism divide. You have questions? We have answers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p>Here’s the full video of the sermon from August 30, 2009. It’s the second half of the sermon entitled “<em>Assurance of Salvation</em>“. Dr. Fernandes defends a sound and biblical doctrine of salvation that successfully overcomes the Calvinism versus Arminisnism divide. You have questions? We have answers!</p>
<p><object width="504" height="375"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6651196&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6651196&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="504" height="375"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/09/assurance-of-salvation-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assurance of Salvation</title>
		<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/08/assurance-of-salvation/</link>
		<comments>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/08/assurance-of-salvation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Ginorio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spoken Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arminianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philfernandes.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Here&#8217;s the full video of the sermon from August 23, 2009. It&#8217;s entitled &#8220;Assurance of Salvation&#8220;. Dr. Fernandes defends a sound and biblical doctrine of salvation that successfully overcomes the Calvinism versus Arminisnism divide. You have questions? We have answers! Watch the full length (45 minute) video on Vimeo.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p>Here&#8217;s the full video of the sermon from August 23, 2009. It&#8217;s entitled &#8220;<em>Assurance of Salvation</em>&#8220;. Dr. Fernandes defends a sound and biblical doctrine of salvation that successfully overcomes the Calvinism versus Arminisnism divide. You have questions? We have answers!</p>
<p></p>
<p><a title="Assurance of Salvation video on Vimeo.com" href="http://vimeo.com/6308160">Watch the full length (45 minute) video on Vimeo.com.</a></p>
<p>
<object width="504" height="378"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6308160&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6308160&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="504" height="378"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/08/assurance-of-salvation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salvation: Lost or Found?</title>
		<link>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/07/salvation-lost-or-found/</link>
		<comments>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/07/salvation-lost-or-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Ginorio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spoken Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arimianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philfernandes.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Calvinism or Arminiansm? It&#8217;s the number one Bible college question of all time. Every freshman wrestles with it. Fortunately, working at a Bible camp brings me into contact with alot of Bible college students. So, this last week, one of the young men asked my opinion on the great Protestant debate. Of course, I&#8217;m not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p>Calvinism or Arminiansm? It&#8217;s the number one Bible college question of all time. Every freshman wrestles with it. Fortunately, working at a Bible camp brings me into contact with alot of Bible college students. So, this last week, one of the young men asked my opinion on the great Protestant debate.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m not a Th.D. I&#8217;m not even a Bible college graduate; that&#8217;s not a claim I make. I only did a year and a half of <a title="International Bible College in San Antonio, TX" href="http://www.ibctx.org">Bible college in Texas.</a> That said, I do listen to and study the doctrines of both Dr. Fernandes and those of my own home church, <a title="Mars Hill Church in Bellevue, WA" href="http://bellevue.marshillchurch.org/">Mars Hill in Bellevue</a>. So keep in mind that the opinions reflected here are my own and may not accurately reflect those of Dr. Fernandes or the staff of the Institute.</p>
<p>So, here presented is my own understanding of salvation. This is also the answer I gave the young man.</p>
<h2>Man in Sinful</h2>
<p>First of all, all Christians can agree that man is totally depraved. We are all sinful, fallen creatures.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230; all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God&#8221; &#8211; Romans 3:23</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no one righteous, not even one &#8230; &#8221; &#8211; Romans 3:10</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; and all our righteousness is as filthy rags&#8221; &#8211; Isaiah 64:6</p></blockquote>
<p>To disagree than man is a sinner is to deny the gospel.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.&#8221; &#8211; I John 1:8</p></blockquote>
<p>There was no argument from the young man nor were there any questions. The doctrine of depravity is an essential part of the gospel message. Indeed, the penalty for our sins is death.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 6:23</p></blockquote>
<h2>Jesus was a Sacrifice for our Atonement</h2>
<p>Second, as a solution to the problm, God provided Jesus: a perfect, spotless sacrifice of atonement for our sin. God offered a kinsman-redeemer to buy us back out of slavery and restore our inheritance.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.&#8221; &#8211; John 3:16</p>
<p>&#8220;He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 4:25</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; when we were God&#8217;s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son&#8221; &#8211; Romans 5:10a</p>
<p>&#8220;But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 5:8</p>
<p>&#8220;For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures &#8230;&#8221; &#8211; I Corinthians 15:3-4</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; and if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.&#8221; &#8211; I Corinthians 15:14</p></blockquote>
<p>This is another essential doctrine of salvation. Jesus died as a sacrifice to pay the penality of our sins. On the third day, He rose again in a <em>spiritual</em> body: a body of flesh and bone indeed, yet no longer merely mortal. As Paul says in I Cor. 15, if you don&#8217;t believe that Christ died for our sins and was raised from the dead your faith is in vain.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that we are free from the demands of the Old Testament laws. Men are simply incapable of obeying the laws of God on their own. Weakness and sin are in our nature. However, through the death of Jesus, we now have a new law. This new law is based on grace and forgiveness rather than obedience to rituals, dietary restrictions and observances. It acknowledges our failings and allows sinful man to be righteous before the holy God.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify&#8221; &#8211; Romans 3:21</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful man to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in sinful man, in order that the righteous requirements of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful nature but according to the Spirit.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 8:1-4</p>
<p>&#8220;The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more,<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><strong> </strong></span></span>so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 5:20-21</p>
<p>&#8220;For sin shall not be your master, because you are not under law, but under grace.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 6:14</p></blockquote>
<h2>God Adopts us as Children</h2>
<p>Once we are truly born again, God adopts us into His family, making us co-heirs with Christ in His kingdom.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God&#8217;s children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs &#8211; heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ &#8230;&#8221; - Romans 8:16-17</p>
<p>&#8220;We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies&#8221; &#8211; Romans 8:22-23</p>
<p>&#8220;So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, God has made you also an heir.&#8221; &#8211; Galatians 4:7</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life.&#8221; &#8211; Titus 3:7</p></blockquote>
<p>Although some younger Christians find this a little hard to understand, this is the point of salvation. If we are saved <em>from</em> sin and death, what does God intend to do with us? He, in His love and grace, makes us co-heirs in Christ&#8217;s kingdom. Forgiving all our sins. You see, since no sin can be in His kingdom, all in the kingdom are given Christ&#8217;s righteousness as white, spotless robes in place of our own <em>filthy rags</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230; and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ &#8211; the righteousness that comes from God and is by faith.&#8221; &#8211; Philippians 3:9</p></blockquote>
<h2>Can We Walk Away?</h2>
<p>Now to the meat and potatoes of this issue. If we were once children of God, reconciled and forgiven, can we reject God and walk away from the Kingdom? Is it possible for those truly born again to be unborn?</p>
<p>In Revelation, John, recording the words of Christ, writes the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.&#8221; &#8211; Rev 2:7b</p>
<p>&#8220;He who overcomes will not be hurt at all by the second death.&#8221; &#8211; Rev 2:11b</p>
<p>&#8220;To him who overcomes and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations&#8221; &#8211; Rev 2:26</p>
<p>&#8220;He who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels.&#8221; &#8211; Rev 3:5</p>
<p>&#8220;To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne&#8221; &#8211; Rev 3:21</p></blockquote>
<p>These square well with what Jesus said about the end of the age:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.&#8221; &#8211; Mark:13:13</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems obvious that one must <em>overcome</em> to be saved and that overcoming involves standing firm in the faith. James, the brother of Jesus, confirms this conviction and also adds some practical theology:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him&#8221; &#8211; James 1:12</p>
<p>&#8220;But someone will say, &#8216;You have faith; I have deeds.&#8217;<br />
Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.&#8221; &#8211; James 2:18</p></blockquote>
<p>Paul, however, speaks of those whom God <em>foreknew</em> being predestined:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will &#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Ephesians 1:4-5</p>
<p>&#8220;In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will &#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Ephesians 1:11</p>
<p>&#8220;For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.&#8221; &#8211; Romans 8:29-30</p></blockquote>
<p>And so the obvious and inevitable question arises: Is Paul contradicting John, James and Jesus? The short answer is: no! Paul himself writes in Romans:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230; in order that the righteous requirements of the law might be fully met in us, <em>who do not live according to the sinful nature but according to the Spirit.</em>&#8221; &#8211; Romans 8:4</p></blockquote>
<p>To reconcile these two views, however, I always turn to Peter, the early head of the Church.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,<br />
To God&#8217;s elect, strangers in the world, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance.&#8221; &#8211; I Peter 1:1-2</p></blockquote>
<p>Paul says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Peter says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230; who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood &#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;">My Conclusion</h2>
<p>What I told the young man with the curious question was this:</p>
<ul>
<li>God knew before the foundation of the world who would be obedient and who would not.</li>
<li>He <em>predestined</em> those whom He foreknew would, through His Spirit, <em>overcome</em> the world (Rom 8:13).</li>
<li>Only those with God&#8217;s Spirit belong to Christ (Rom 8:9) and only they can can please Him.</li>
<li>So it is those whom God conforms into the likeness of His Son, through His Spirit, who are saved. Those He also justifies and glorifies (Rom 8:30).</li>
</ul>
<p>Unfortunately, we can&#8217;t see the world like God sees it. We don&#8217;t know who will and who won&#8217;t remain faithful to Christ. We have no idea who God has <em>predestined</em> to salvation. So, how should we respond?</p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;">Once again, here was my advice to the young man:</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>Be ready in and out of season to give a defense for the hope that is in you.</li>
<li>Preach the gospel when the opportunity presents itself.</li>
<li>Be an example and a light in your community.</li>
<li>Exhort other Christians to remain faithful and strong in the gospel of Christ.</li>
<li>Those who remain faithful to the end were those God foreknew and predestined for salvation.</li>
<li>Those who do not, God foreknew would fall away. The blame is still squarely on their own shoulders.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, there it is. I welcome comments and suggestions.</p>
<p>Blessings on all my brothers and sisters in Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://instituteofbiblicaldefense.com/2009/07/salvation-lost-or-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
